Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(5): 102586, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302444

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In February 2020, robotic surgery was introduced in University Hospital of St Pierre in Reunion Island. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of robotic assisted surgery in the hospital and its impact on operating times and patient outcomes. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing laparoscopic robotic assisted surgery between February 2020 and February 2022. Information included patient demographics, type of surgery, operating times and length of stay. RESULTS: Over the two-year study period, 137 patients underwent laparoscopic robotic assisted surgery performed by 6 different surgeons. 89 of the surgeries were in gynecology, including 58 hysterectomies, 37 were in digestive surgery, and 11 in urology. The installation and docking times decreased across all specialties and were found to be significantly reduced when comparing the first and last 15 hysterectomies: mean installation time decreased from 18.7 to 14.5 minutes (p=0.048), mean docking time decreased from 11.3 to 7.1 minutes (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of robotic assisted surgery in an isolated territory such as Reunion Island was slow due to a lack of trained surgeons, supply difficulties and Covid crisis. Despite these challenges, the use of robotic surgery allowed for technically more challenging surgeries and demonstrated similar learning curves to other centers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gynecology , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Reunion/epidemiology , Hysterectomy
2.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(21)2022 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2090134

ABSTRACT

In March 2020, the French government implemented nation-wide measures to reduce social contact and slow the progression of the emerging coronavirus responsible for COVID-19, the most significant being a complete home lockdown that lasted 8 weeks. Reunion Island is a French overseas department marked by large social inequalities. We draw the hypothesis that distancing and lockdown measures may have contributed to an increase in the social inequalities in health (SIH) on Reunion Island. The aim of our study was to describe the SIH during lockdown in the Reunionese population. We implemented a cross-sectional telephone survey conducted between 13 May and 22 July 2020, using a retrospective data collection on the lockdown period. A total of 892 adult participants (≥18 years) were recruited in the 114 large Reunionese neighborhoods using the quota method within the national "White Pages" telephone directory. Degraded psychological states, an increase in addictive behaviors, difficulties in accessing food, a decrease in physical activity, delayed medical appointments, violence against women, and health problems in children were driven by the socio-economic characteristics of the population, most often to the disadvantage of social groups exposed to poor living conditions. These results suggest that the COVID-19 lockdown contributed to an increase in SIH.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Reunion/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Social Conditions
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(4): 895-898, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1817896

ABSTRACT

In January 2021, after detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, genomic surveillance was established on Réunion Island to track the introduction and spread of SARS-CoV-2 lineages and variants of concern. This system identified 22 SARS-CoV-2 lineages, 71% of which were attributed to the Beta variant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Humans , Reunion/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
4.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0267184, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1793492

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: No data are available on severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the French overseas department of Reunion Island. This is unfortunate as the microorganisms responsible for the disease are likely to differ from those in temperate regions due to a tropical climate and proximity to other islands of the Indian Ocean region. The aim of this study was to assess the epidemiological, clinical, prognosis, and microbiological characteristics of patients with severe CAP in Reunion Island. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated all patients with CAP aged >18 years and hospitalized in one of the two intensive care units of Reunion Island between 2016 and 2018. Microorganisms were identified by culture from blood and respiratory samples, multiplex polymerase chain reaction from respiratory samples, urinary antigen tests, and serology. RESULTS: Over the study period, 573 cases of severe CAP were recorded, with a mean incidence of 22 per 100,000 person-years. The most frequently isolated microorganism was influenza (21.9%) followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (12%). The influenza virus was detected in affected patients all year round. Twenty-four patients with severe CAP came from another island of the Indian Ocean region (4.2%), mainly Madagascar (>50%). Two of these patients presented with melioidosis and 4 were infected with Acinetobacter spp. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have major implications for the management of severe CAP in tropical regions. The most frequently isolated microorganism in patients with severe CAP in Reunion Island is influenza followed by S. pneumoniae. Physicians should be aware that influenza is the main cause of severe CAP in patients living in or returning from Reunion Island, where this virus circulates all year round.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Influenza, Human , Pneumonia , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Reunion/epidemiology
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(48): e27881, 2021 Dec 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583961

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: In February 2021, an explosion of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia overwhelmed the only hospital in Mayotte. To report a case series of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to SARS-CoV-2 who were evacuated by air from Mayotte to Reunion Island.This retrospective observational study evaluated all consecutive patients with ARF due to SARS-CoV-2 who were evacuated by air from Mayotte Hospital to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Félix Guyon University Hospital in Reunion Island between February 2, and March 5, 2021.A total of 43 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were evacuated by air, for a total flight time of 2 hours and a total travel time of 6 hours. Of these, 38 patients (88.4%) with a median age of 55 (46-65) years presented with ARF and were hospitalized in our ICU. Fifteen patients were screened for the SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 variant, all of whom tested positive. Thirteen patients (34.2%) developed an episode of severe hypoxemia during air transport, and the median paO2/FiO2 ratio was lower on ICU admission (140 [102-192] mmHg) than on departure (165 [150-200], P = .022). Factors associated with severe hypoxemia during air transport was lack of treatment with curare (P = .012) and lack of invasive mechanical ventilation (P = .003). Nine patients (23.7%) received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in our ICU. Seven deaths (18.4%) occurred in hospital.Emergency air evacuation of patients with ARF due to SARS-CoV-2 was associated with severe hypoxemia but remained feasible. In cases of ARF due to SARS-CoV-2 requiring emergency air evacuation, sedated patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and curare should be prioritized over nonintubated patients. It is noteworthy that patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia related to the 501Y.V2 variant were very severe despite their young age.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , COVID-19/complications , Hypoxia/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Respiratory Insufficiency , Transportation of Patients , Aged , Aircraft , COVID-19/diagnosis , Comoros , Curare , Humans , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Reunion/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
8.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(4): e0008879, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1201424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading globally, several countries are handling dengue epidemics. As both infections are deemed to share similarities at presentation, it would be useful to distinguish COVID-19 from dengue in the context of co-epidemics. Hence, we performed a retrospective cohort study to identify predictors of both infections. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: All the subjects suspected of COVID-19 between March 23 and May 10, 2020, were screened for COVID-19 within the testing center of the University hospital of Saint-Pierre, Reunion island. The screening consisted in a questionnaire surveyed in face-to-face, a nasopharyngeal swab specimen for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription polymerase chain-reaction and a rapid diagnostic orientation test for dengue. Factors independently associated with COVID-19 or with dengue were sought using multinomial logistic regression models, taking other febrile illnesses (OFIs) as controls. Adjusted Odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI) were assessed. Over a two-month study period, we diagnosed 80 COVID-19, 61 non-severe dengue and 872 OFIs cases eligible to multivariate analysis. Among these, we identified delayed presentation (>3 days) since symptom onset (Odds ratio 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.39), contact with a COVID-19 positive case (OR 3.81, 95%CI 2.21-6.55) and anosmia (OR 7.80, 95%CI 4.20-14.49) as independent predictors of COVID-19, body ache (OR 6.17, 95%CI 2.69-14.14), headache (OR 5.03, 95%CI 1.88-13.44) and retro-orbital pain (OR 5.55, 95%CI 2.51-12.28) as independent predictors of dengue, while smoking was less likely observed with COVID-19 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.09-0.79) and upper respiratory tract infection symptoms were associated with OFIs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although prone to potential biases, these data suggest that non-severe dengue may be more symptomatic than COVID-19 in a co-epidemic setting with higher dengue attack rates. At clinical presentation, nine basic clinical and epidemiological indicators may help to distinguish COVID-19 or dengue from each other and other febrile illnesses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Dengue/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Dengue/epidemiology , Dengue/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Reunion/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Encephale ; 47(5): 413-419, 2021 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065061

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic raised a lot of anxiety around the world. France is composed of several overseas territories with major cultural differences but also with a different exposure to the COVID-19. Reunion Island is the most populated overseas French department, but few researches have focused on this population. Therefore, the main objective was to explore and compare the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (perceived stress, risk and fear of being infected, severity, lockdown respect, perceived stress, quality of life, quality of relationship, loneliness, resilience) during the lockdown among residents of metropolitan France and of Reunion Island. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 347 participants, aged from 18 to 78 (M=37.90; DS=13.20) replied to a questionnaire posted online during the last ten days of the lockdown in France. The sample is divided into 227 metropolitans (M=38.24 DS=13.41; 13.2% of men) and 120 residents of Reunion Island (M=37.26; DS=12.81; 31.7% of men). Resilience, loneliness and perceived stress have been assessed using validating scales while specific items have been created to assess COVID-19 impacts. RESULTS: The majority of the total sample has been little exposed to the COVID-19, but the estimated severity was high throughout the sample. Several significant differences have been observed between overseas and metropolitans. The latter, who were more exposed, were more respectful of lockdown measures and felt more concerned about being contaminated. They also had different professional activities (work at home, stop working) since the lockdown than did the overseas sample. Non-significant higher scores of resilience and quality of life during the lockdown contrast in the overseas sample, who estimated risk, fear and severity similarly. In correlational analyses, many relationships were significant only in one sample. For example, in metropolitans the higher the loneliness, the higher the severity. In the other sample, the higher the perceived stress, the higher the respect of lockdown measures, while more metropolitans felt lonely the more they respected these measures. Regressional analysis showed different predictive variables of the scores of perceived stress and fear of being contaminated. In metropolitans, stress was explained by COVID-19 related variables (fear, severity, respect), loneliness and negatively by resilience and quality of life while in the other sample it was explained by fear of being infected and negatively by resilience. Fear of being infected was explained by risk and stress in the overseas, but also by quality of life in the metropolitan sample. CONCLUSIONS: This study brings new data on the important psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on two French samples. Observed differences highlight a higher fear of being infected among the metropolitans who were generally more exposed. Overseas from La Réunion did not feel more spared by this risk, despite the limited number of cases since the appearance of the first case in March 11th and the end of the lockdown in May 11th. Despite exposure, our results could be explained by several cultural differences such as way of life or beliefs. Overseas life in Reunion Island might bring more resilience and less loneliness given the particular familial, social and religious functioning. Given the limits of this study and the lack of similar comparisons, more work could highlight the protective factors of these populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Reunion/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Trop Med Int Health ; 26(4): 444-452, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-991695

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the differential diagnoses of severe COVID-19 and the distinguishing characteristics of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Reunion Island to help improve the triage and management of patients in this tropical setting. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted from 11 March to 4 May 2020 in the only intensive care unit (ICU) authorised to manage COVID-19 patients in Reunion Island, a French overseas department located in the Indian Ocean region. All patients with unknown COVID-19 status were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on ICU admission; those who tested negative were transferred to the COVID-19-free area of the ICU. RESULTS: Over the study period, 99 patients were admitted to our ICU. A total of 33 patients were hospitalised in the COVID-19 isolation ward, of whom 11 were positive for COVID-19. The main differential diagnoses of severe COVID-19 were as follows: community-acquired pneumonia, dengue, leptospirosis causing intra-alveolar haemorrhage and cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The median age of COVID-19-positive patients was higher than that of COVID-19-negative patients (71 [58-74] vs. 54 [46-63.5] years, P = 0.045). No distinguishing clinical, biological or radiological characteristics were found between the two groups of patients. All COVID-19-positive patients had recently travelled or been in contact with a recent traveller. CONCLUSIONS: In Reunion Island, dengue and leptospirosis are key differential diagnoses of severe COVID-19, and travel is the only distinguishing characteristic of COVID-19-positive patients. Our findings apply only to the particular context of Reunion Island at this time of the epidemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Patient Isolation , Triage , Aged , Dengue/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Leptospirosis/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Reunion/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Travel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL